|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Click here for more info!
|
|
 |
|
Robot Warriors May Win Future Wars
From: Dagbladet Politiken, Copenhagen, Denmark
Date: February 19, 2005
By: Niels-Peter Granzow Busch
Translated from Danish by Lars Meldal (affiliated with TerminatorFiles)
While robots are fighting rebels in Iraq today, the U.S. Army is planning for still more battle robots in
the future. Large sums of money have been channelled into a programme for winning future wars.
Robots do not require salaries or pensions. They need no sleep. But above all, they fear neither killing others nor
being killed themselves. They are the born soldiers, pure and simple. This is how the straightforward and cynical
score record looks like, as the United States of America is embarking on a major enterprise to raise an army of
robots. The first robots have already proven their worth in operations in Iraq. But more are on their way.
Obvious advantages
“Not until recently has the army seriously started the development of robots, but in ten or fifteen years time, a
very large part of the army will be made up of robots”, says John Pike to Politiken. John Pike is a leading American
military analyst and the director of Global Security, an independent American web site analyzing global trends in
military affairs. He believes that obvious advantages exist for the U.S. in launching robots for the battle fields
of the future.
The future is near
His predictions are confirmed by a number of sources from the U.S. Defence, who appeared in The New York Times last
week. According to the newspaper, a very large part of the U.S. combat troops will be made up of robots in less than
ten years time.
“The U.S. Army will have these robots. It is no longer a question of ‘if', only of ‘when'”, says Gordon Johnson from
the U.S. Army's commanders-in-chief department in the Pentagon, to the newspaper.
For starters, the robots will be remote controlled by humans, but in the longer term, the vision is that they must be
able to operate more or less independently.
Infinitely brave
In total, 127 billion dollars have been put into the programme called ‘Future Combat Systems' - the largest enterprise
in the history of the U.S. Defence.
“These robots are infinitely brave, since they do not fear to die, and they have no relatives who will miss them if
they did”, John Pike explains. He goes on: “Instead of deploying an army of human soldiers to the battle field, where
half of them - countless studies show this - will never fire one single shot, and almost everybody without exception
will be afraid to hurt somebody, we dispatch robots that have no pity and kill without mercy.”
Cheap robots
It is yet another advantage for the U.S. Defence that the robots are far cheaper to run than the ordinary G.I. Joe,
who - according to a Pentagon report - costs more than three million dollars in training, equipment and pensions. In
future pensions alone, the Pentagon presently owes more than 500 billion dollars to its soldiers.
Today, hundreds of American automated vehicles equipped with grab arms and cameras are already engaged in removing
trip mines in Iraq or exploring rebel mountain cave systems in Afghanistan. In only two months from now, eighteen new
so-called SWORD robots, all armed with a machine cannon, are scheduled for deployment in the ongoing fighting against
rebels in Iraq. These robots, about one meter high/tall, drive on caterpillars and are remote controlled by human
soldiers via laptop computers.
|
|
|
Spy drones
In the air, robots have long been flying around for the Americans, namely the unmanned so-called drones, aptly named
‘Predator' (carnivorous animal). These drones, remote controlled by operators in a command center located in the Nevada
Desert in the U.S., were already used for surveillance tasks in 1995 during the conflict in the former Yugoslavia, and
they have recently stirred the Iranian government by flying across the nuclear facilities of the country, spying.
Lately, American television corporations have put a pressure on the Pentagon to release photos of drones firing missiles
at Iraqi rebels. The Americans have a total of 58 drones in operation throughout the world. Most of these are not equipped
with weapons, though.
However, newer and more advanced generations of robots are rapidly on their way. The American weapons corporation Lockheed
Martin, for instance, has on its drawing board a series of thirteen different types of unmanned war robots for operations
at sea, on land and in the air. Among these is a two and a half ton heavy robot tank called MULE, and according to a
spokesperson for the corporation, the first prototype has already been successfully tested and approved by the U.S.
Defence. It remains to be settled when production will get started.
“But we are looking forward to delivering MULE to the defence. It will exceed all expectations”, a written statement
runs from Lockheed Martin to Politiken.
Changing wars
John Pike from Global Security believes that the introduction of robots in wars will fundamentally change traditional
warfare in the same way gunpowder, aeroplanes and tanks did.
“I think that, confronted with such an enemy, most ordinary soldiers will simply flee, since they have no hope of winning
the battle anyway. That is why I also believe that the U.S. will - as far as possible - attempt to secure a monopoly
position for itself, controlling the robots”, the analyst explains. He imagines a sort of Pax Americana in the future,
because most countries will not dare starting major wars or bother the Americans at all, fearing the war robots.
Man is in control
The editor of the reputed military magazine Janes Defence Weekly, Peter Felstead, is not that concerned: “I don't see
a situation in the near future where the military will put its trust primarily in robotics systems, since it will always
be necessary to have a person in control of the robot. It takes a human decision when a robot is to fire a weapon.”
The editor does imagine, though, that robots and human soldiers will cooperate on various assignments in the future.
“But robots will never replace humans completely in a war. There are too many tasks that can be carried out only in the
old-fashioned way by using ordinary human soldiers”, he says.
John Pike from Global Security sees both positive and negative aspects of a future where a large part of the U.S. combat
troops will be made up of robots. “We did nothing about the genocide in Rwanda, since we knew that intervening in the
conflict would have cost a lot of dead soldiers, and nobody wanted to explain to the electorate why soldiers could be
sacrificed in a conflict where nothing was at stake for the U.S. But if we had been able to dispatch robots, I think we
would have done so”, he explains.
Copyright © 2005 Niels-Peter Granzow Busch and Dagbladet Politiken
This article has been translated and reproduced with permission from the publisher
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| HOT STUFF |
» T4 rumours and gossip
» T:SCC Podcasts
» Shopping page
» Updates to our site
» FanProjects
|
|
| SEARCH THE WEB / OUR SITE |
Powered by 
|
|
| LATEST COLLECTIBLE OFFERS |
New deals coming!
We are in talks with several new dealers for some cool exclusive items! More info coming asap!
|
|
| INTERACT WITH OTHER FANS |
To comment on this, or just to sound off in lots of Terminator topics, visit our
forums!
Lurk around or register and
meet fans from around the
world discussing their, your
(and our) favorite subject!
|
|
| TERMINATOR SHOPPING |
Check our shopping
page for cool offers and special deals!
Or do a targeted search at...
Find those Terminator books, dvds, gaming, progams, music, toys and vhs related products!
|
|
| DISCLAIMER |
TerminatorFiles contains items of interest from lots of different sources. Though reproduced here, there is no
copyright
infringement intended. This is purely for the interest of fellow Terminator fans.
All trademarks are the property of their respective owners. The opinions expressed in this website
aren't necessarily those of the editors. This site is in no way connected to any official film studio.
Read our full disclaimer here.
|
|
| STATISTICS |
Last modified: Feb 04 2008
|
|
|
